Graduate students and advisors
Read papers with page-cited answers, keep verbatim quotes in evidence notes, draft from the sources you select, and run an integrity review before submission.
Start in ChatPDF, where answers about an uploaded paper carry page-cited references back to the document. Reading notes built this way keep every claim attached to the passage it came from, so the thesis evidence base is verifiable from the first day of reading.
Save each passage you will rely on as an evidence note that holds the exact quote and the page it came from. Every note re-checks itself against the current document, so agreements, conflicts, and gaps across your reading stay visible — and traceable — before drafting begins.
Hand the papers you chose to Writer Agent and draft against them. The agent works from the sources in your workspace and marks unsupported claims as needing a source, so a thesis paragraph never quietly outruns its evidence.
Before the thesis leaves your hands, run an integrity review that examines visible quotation, citation, and attribution patterns in the submitted draft and reports findings with exact excerpts. Then reopen the original sources yourself, and pair the report with your institution's disclosure policy and your advisor's review.
No. The workflow keeps authorship with the student: sources stay reference-only, unsupported claims are flagged rather than filled in, and the integrity review documents evidence instead of generating conclusions. Disclosure of AI assistance still follows the institution's policy.
Yes. Evidence notes show which passages support which claims, review history records what has already been checked, and integrity review reports give advisors evidence to discuss rather than a score to enforce.
No. Integrity Review examines the submitted draft for visible citation, quotation, and attribution gaps; it neither compares sources nor runs detection. Verify sources separately, and interpret any detection signal with context and policy.